知艾家园

 找回密码
 注册会员
查看: 12786|回复: 7

窗口期,帮大家脱恐,内容来自medhelp上的dr.hook

[复制链接]
发表于 2012-9-5 16:34 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
我就搞不懂,哪来那么多6周后阳的,恰恰都在中国,太神奇了
要知道美国感染者是中国的1倍
A
i had unprotected sex with a HIV guy 10 weeks ago. 6.5 weeks after the exposure, i did a OraQuick test, and it was negative. would like to know how the accuracy is like? I will be doing a test at 12th week, but currently very worried. Have been so worried that i have been thinking about it every minute. please advise
我10周前和一个HIV感染者WTXJ。6.5周时,我做了一个快速唾液试纸测试,阴。
请问测试大概有多少准确性,我需要12周的时候再次测试吗

股票软件开发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-5 16:34 | 显示全部楼层
HOOK
Welcome to the Forum.  The good news is that  even if your partner had HIV, less than 1% of sexual exposures lead to infection.  The test you had would have detected over 95% of recently acquired HIV infections.  You o not need to wait until 12 weeks for complete assurance, at 8 weeks your test will provide completely reliable informatio
一个好消息是如果你同伴有HIV,你只有少于1%的可能通过性感染。你所做的检测可以排除95%以上的可能。你不需要等到12周才去测试,8周的测试可以给你完全可信的信息。


A
thanks doc. last question. Have u ever read or known any encounters of people getting tested NEGATIVE at the 6th week using OraQuick test, but turned out to be positive at the 12th week? Thanks doc for your advice
谢谢。你是否见过6周唾液试纸阴,12周阳的
股票软件开发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-5 16:34 | 显示全部楼层
HOOK
I have never had this happen.  IT has happened in the past to others, that is the reason for the recommendation.  Please no more "what if" or "have you ever" questions- they serve little purpose.  EWH
我没见过。这种事情以前在别人身上发生过,这是3个月窗口期的原因

A
Hi doc, just did a test at 10.5 weeks. Is negative. So is that conclusive? Cos I read from some sites that recommend 12 weeks
我刚刚做了一个10.5周的测试,阴。这个是最终结果吗,是否还要12周再测

HOOK
These results are conclusive an should be believed.  You did not get HIV from the exposure you described.  There is no need for further testing.   EWH
这是最终结果,可以信任。你在这次行为中没有感染HIV,不需要再测了
股票软件开发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-5 16:36 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 sscc1112 于 2012-9-5 16:38 编辑

Finally, when can you be tested and be sure you did not get HIV.  the answer is at 8 weeks.    For all practical purposes the HIV antibody tests current in use provide accurate information on the presence or absence of HIV infection in virtually everyone at 8 weeks following exposure.  The recommendations for testing at 3 and even 6 months are the result of two factors- data from older tests no longer used (you really do not need to worry about which generation of tests you were tested with, at this time virtually all tests are far more sensitive that they were even 2-3 years ago when the 3 month recommendation was made) and secondly, the fact that some, mostly governmental agencies which have to provide recommendations for virtually everyone without the sort of interactions such as those you get with your doctor or on personalized sites such as this one, feel they cannot "afford" to be wrong and therefore make recommendations and guidelines which leave most people unnecessarily nervous for 4-6 weeks longer than the 6-8 weeks it takes virtually everyone to develop HIV antibodies.   

这一段就不翻译了
股票软件开发
发表于 2012-9-5 17:07 | 显示全部楼层
明白人很少!大家都怕
股票软件开发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-7 10:30 | 显示全部楼层
顶一下,太多人自己吓唬自己了
medhelp上没有转的,怎么中国论坛上这么多转的
股票软件开发
发表于 2014-6-4 12:59 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
就是,中国真的是奇人多。
股票软件开发
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2014-6-15 19:00 | 显示全部楼层
看看顶顶顶顶
股票软件开发
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册会员

本版积分规则

本站为防艾公益性网站,志愿者建议仅供参考,请以医院诊断为准,感谢优尔网络提供技术支持。
寄语

QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|知艾家园 ( 粤ICP备20006108号

GMT+8, 2024-11-24 16:51 , Processed in 0.154910 second(s), 31 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表